Германские языки | Филологический аспект №05 (133) Май 2026

Освещение российской тематики в Британских СМИ

Мальцев Владислав Алексеевич
Студент, магистрант 2 курса, направление «Современная международная журналистика», Российский университет дружбы народов, Россия, г.Москва

Аннотация: В статье анализируется процесс формирования образа России в британских печатных и цифровых СМИ в контексте современной геополитической напряженности (2022–2026). Рассматривается взаимосвязь между политической ангажированностью редакций и методами манипулирования в СМИ. В ходе исследования были выявлены и классифицированы конкретные фреймы: «советское наследие», «информационная война» и «персонифицированная угроза». Особое внимание уделяется роли эмоционально-оценочной лексики в создании образа «экзистенциального врага». Исследование подтверждает, что представление России в британских СМИ по-прежнему формируется под влиянием исторических предрассудков, что приводит к устойчивому искажению восприятия России британской общественностью.
Ключевые слова: британская пресса, медийный образ России, дискурс-анализ, фрейминг, политическая коммуникация, стереотипы, информационная война, антироссийские нарративы, британские СМИ.

Maltsev Vladislav Alekseevich
student Master's student of the seconf year, direction ‘Contemporary International Journalism’, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Russia, Moscow, e-mail: vladislav.maltzev02@yandex.ru

Abstract: This article analyses the process of shaping Russia’s image in the British print and digital media against the backdrop of current geopolitical tensions (2022–2026). It examines the relationship between editorial bias and manipulative techniques in the media. The study identified and classified specific frames: ‘Soviet legacy’, ‘information war’ and ‘personified threat’. Particular attention is paid to the role of emotionally charged and evaluative vocabulary in creating the image of an ‘existential enemy’. The study confirms that the portrayal of Russia in the British media continues to be shaped by historical prejudices, leading to a persistent distortion of the British public’s perception of Russia.
Keywords: the British press, Russia’s media image, discourse analysis, framing, political communication, stereotypes, information warfare, anti-Russian narratives, the British media.

Introduction. The United Kingdom has always held a significant position within the international system as one of Russia’s most important Western allies. For over four centuries, their relationship has been characterised by complexity and ambiguity. The evolution of bilateral dialogue reflects broader patterns in Russia’s relations with the West, demonstrating alternating phases of both cooperation and confrontation, whilst always maintaining mutual interest. The formation of perceptions of Russia within British society began as early as the 9th to 13th centuries, when historical records began to feature depictions of a warlike Russian people, vast lands, and emblematic symbols such as the ‘Russian bear’ and an ‘excessively’ sprawling Moscow.

Discussion. The British media, with their audience of millions, play a significant role in shaping public opinion about Russia. An important aspect is not only the size of the audience, but also the frequency with which the media cover Russian topics. The regularity of publications helps to reinforce certain stereotypes and interpretations in the public consciousness. Research shows that Russia occupies a prominent place in the British media’s news agenda. For example, according to a study by A. V. Sharikov, in 2022 around 4.5 million texts were analysed across 416 British online resources, and Russia ranked fourth in terms of the number of mentions, behind only the UK, the US and Ukraine. Publications such as the Financial Times, The Independent and The Times covered Russian topics most actively, confirming their significance for both specialist and mass audiences [1].

A long-term analysis of trends in the Anglo-Saxon media landscape also demonstrates sustained interest in Russian topics. A study in the journal ‘International Life’, covering more than 20,000 global sources between 2022 and 2024, showed that Russia consistently ranks among the top three countries most frequently mentioned in the media. In the second stage of the analysis, which included around 9,500 English-language sources, it was found that a significant proportion of publications about Russia had a negative tone [2].

The conflict in Ukraine has acted as a catalyst for a sharp increase in the number of publications about Russia. A study published in the journal Libri [3] used Dirichlet latent class analysis (LDA) to analyse 14,316 news articles from publications such as The Guardian, The Daily Mail and The Times during the first 16 months of the conflict (from February 2022 to June 2023). This study revealed an unprecedented density of news coverage and identified differences in thematic focus between the quality and tabloid press.

The data shows that Russian affairs occupy a central place in the British media agenda. The high frequency of publications creates a solid foundation for shaping public opinion and employing various methods of interpreting events.

Table 1. Key readership figures for British newspapers and Sky News (2023–2024)

The British agenda is dominated by a view of Russia through the prism of rivalry. The press has traditionally focused most of its attention on military clashes and conflicts of values. The interpretation of events and the emotional tone of news reports undergo changes depending on the historical context, differing markedly, for example, during the Second World War compared with the current era of information warfare.

The ‘war’ frame is widely used to shape public opinion, whilst the emotional component and interpretation of events evolve, reflecting current geopolitical tensions. There is a tendency to draw parallels between modern Russia and its Soviet past, with frequent references to the Bolshevik Revolution, Stalinist repression and the collapse of communism. These historical echoes are generally portrayed in a negative light, reinforcing the perception that Russia is haunted by a ‘sinister’ Soviet legacy [4].

In The Daily Telegraph [5], author I. Stradner, in an article dated 29 May 2025, directly compares Putin and Stalin, interpreting the rehabilitation of Stalin’s image in Russia as part of a psychological campaign. Examples are given of the erection of monuments to Stalin, the closure of the ‘Perm-36’ memorial and the dissolution of the ‘Memorial’ society, whilst new school textbooks that justify Stalinism are also mentioned. The headline ‘Putin’s love for Stalin should horrify us all’ sets the tone of the article – openly negative, portraying Putin as the heir to a totalitarian tradition

In its 17 March 2024 article on the Russian elections [6], *The Standard* quotes remarks made by Grant Shapps, a politician and member of the Conservative Party. In these remarks, Vladimir Putin is compared to Stalin. This serves to reinforce a critical assessment of the political situation in Russia. The article also examines issues such as the suppression of the opposition, control over society and the lack of competition in elections. This sets a negative tone for the coverage of events.

The British media frequently make references to the Soviet era when covering Russian topics. Writers employ vocabulary with historical connotations. For example, in The Telegraph’s articles, the words ‘ghost’ and ‘spectre’ create a sense of a ‘return to the past’.

For example, the words ‘ghost’ and ‘spectre’ in The Telegraph’s articles create the effect of a ‘return to the past’, emphasising the continuity of threats associated with Russia. The tone of the articles reveals marked differences between the publications. Whilst The Telegraph and the London Evening Standard actively use emotionally charged vocabulary, including military metaphors and apocalyptic comparisons, The Guardian and The Independent adopt a more restrained style. However, this restraint does not imply neutrality. Journalists nevertheless maintain a critical stance, carefully verifying their sources and presenting well-considered arguments.

This distinction is borne out by recent research into media discourse, which shows that coverage of the Russia-Ukraine crisis remains highly politicised. Since the strategies and tone of reporting are largely determined by editorial policy and genre-specific characteristics, it is important to note that it would be wrong to reduce Russia’s image to the role of a mere ‘political adversary’.

This thesis is supported by an editorial in The Guardian dated 22 February 2026, ‘The Guardian view on the fourth anniversary of Putin’s war: Ukraine is exhausted, but not broken’ [7]. The title of the conflict in the headline, ‘Putin’s war’, shifts the focus from geopolitics to the figure of the Russian president. This thus sets a certain evaluative framework for the reader, simplifying the ‘aggressor–victim’ dichotomy. The authors employ the most expressive vocabulary possible: ‘revanchist ambitions’, the metaphor of a ‘meat grinder’ and the term ‘relentless attrition’. Such characterisations do not merely convey a picture of events, but also elicit a predetermined emotional response from the reader, reinforcing the image of the aggressor.

Similar tactics can be found in the Daily Mail. In an article dated 29 March 2025 concerning the possible deployment of British troops to Ukraine, a threatening tone and emotionally charged language are employed. The personification of the threat reduces a complex international conflict to the image of a single leader. The use of phrases expressing necessity and probability, such as ‘may provoke’ and ‘could lead to’, creates the impression that disaster is inevitable.

The deconstruction of logical manipulations in the British press boils down to the substitution of rational analysis with emotional appeal. Such fallacies include: post hoc ergo propter hoc (a false understanding of causality), false dichotomy (for example, ‘an unconditional victory for Ukraine or a crushing defeat for the West’) and ad hominem [8].

The coverage of Russian issues in the British media is closely linked to the perception of Russia as a source of information operations, disinformation and external interference. In British media discourse, Russian campaigns are often described not only as instances of propaganda, but also as part of a broader strategy to undermine trust in Western institutions, primarily NATO, the EU and democratic procedures. As a result, in such publications, Russia is portrayed not merely as a state involved in an international conflict, but as an active agent of destabilisation, threatening the information security of the UK and its allies.

The British media are actively covering the technological aspects of ‘hybrid confrontation’, with a particular focus on the use of artificial intelligence and disinformation technologies. In its article, The Times [9] examined in detail a network of fake news sites such as ‘Pravda’ and ‘Portal Kombat’. The newspaper cited a corpus of 350,000 posts, interpreting them as a targeted campaign to discredit the British establishment and the royal family. This perspective allows The Times to construct an image of Russia not merely as a geopolitical rival, but as a technologically equipped ‘agent of destabilisation’ employing AI algorithms to erode democratic procedures.

A similar tendency to oversimplify complex processes can also be observed in the audiovisual media. In a March 2025 Sky News report on protests in Russia, systematic analysis gives way to personalisation: the conflict is reduced to the figure of Vladimir Putin, whose style of governance is characterised by the pithy phrase ‘authoritarian grip’. By drawing parallels with the dictatorial regimes of the past, the correspondent shapes the audience’s perception of events [10].

One trend that cannot be overlooked in this study is that geopolitical issues are presented not as an abstract conflict, but through the personal experiences of a specific individual. Thus, in a Daily Star article dated 31 July 2025 entitled ‘999 call handler baffled after Russian AI bots use his voice to win elections’ [11], the story of Russian AI bots interfering in the Polish elections is revealed through the story of dispatcher Aaron. His voice, recorded for a public service announcement, was used without his knowledge by AI algorithms to fabricate a video about interference in the electoral process in Poland. The protagonist of the piece directly expresses what many must have felt: ‘... even even my friends or family wouldn’t be able to tell it was fake... realising that my video was used in this way is truly frightening.” This approach shifts the focus from the political event to a level that is emotionally significant for the reader — the threat to identity and privacy.

If you step back from the news story and examine the structure of the article, you can see how a sense of distance is created between the reader and the threat. Instead of the usual image of an anonymous hacker, the editorial team places Aaron—a dispatcher whose voice was stolen directly from a public service announcement—at the centre of events. The proximity effect kicks in: if this could happen to ‘the bloke from the news’, then it could happen to me too. This technique – essentially ‘victim storytelling’ – does not merely evoke sympathy; it instantly shapes the image of the enemy. Characteristically, this enemy is no longer so much political as it is technological: AI, deepfakes, cyberspace. It is curious that, thanks to this technological packaging, the concepts of ‘war’ or ‘interference’ spill over from the realm of familiar political debate into the realm of the ordinary person’s existential fears.

In October 2025, The Mirror [12] employs a technique we might describe as ‘real-time digital exposure’. The editorial team examines a story about the alleged capture of Kupiansk. On the face of it, this is a purely military topic. However, the newspaper focuses not on analysing maps of military operations, but on a video selfie of Zelenskyy taken against a backdrop of recognisable landmarks. In doing so, the emphasis shifts from the official version of events to visual evidence intended to confirm the Ukrainian leader’s presence in the city. Such media presentation not only challenges the Russian interpretation of events but also contrasts the official source of information with a more immediate and visually compelling format.

British tabloids frequently portray Russia as a criminalised and dangerous actor operating not only abroad but also within the United Kingdom. For instance, the Metro’s 8 March 2025 article ‘Putin has “planted more Russian spies in Britain” after gang caught at beach house’ [13] and the 4 December 2025 article ‘From Novichok to Telegram: Putin’s recipe for “mayhem” in the UK’ [14] describe spy networks, recruitment via Telegram, the use of honeytraps and the preparation of attacks on investigative journalists. Taken together, these materials paint a picture of the threat as multifaceted and spread across various channels, and therefore difficult to pinpoint. In this sense, Russia is portrayed not as the source of a single incident, but as a constant and multifaceted threat.

In articles linking Russia to immediate risks to British society, the trope of direct victimisation is becoming increasingly prevalent. The headline of an LBC article from February 2026, ‘Rearm now or risk ruin: Britain faces a shrinking three-year window to prepare for war’ [15], sounds like a warning. From this perspective, Russia loses the characteristics of a conventional geopolitical opponent and becomes a direct catalyst for the mobilisation agenda within the United Kingdom. The focus shifts from an analysis of external causes to the imperative of defending national security

A similar technique involves expanding the geographical scope of the conflict. This is employed in a Daily Mail article [16] dated 2 March 2025. Reports of false bomb threats at polling stations in Northampton and Liverpool, attributed to Russian intelligence services, are framed within the context of the Moldovan elections. In doing so, the publication constructs a narrative in which Moscow’s actions threaten not just a single Eastern European country, but simultaneously undermine democratic processes within the UK as well. The boundary between a ‘distant’ crisis and domestic security is deliberately blurred, and the image of Russia takes on the characteristics of an omnipresent destabilising force.

At the same time, in a number of publications, Russia is portrayed not as an independent political actor, but as a figure whose actions are interpreted through the lens of other parties to the conflict. In an article in the Daily Express [17] from August 2025, the prospects for a peaceful settlement are linked primarily to Donald Trump’s stance, rather than to the actions of the Russian side. Similarly, an article in The Independent [18] from April 2026 is based largely on a statement by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, whilst alternative interpretations are virtually absent. This approach to reporting limits Russia’s agency and reduces it to the status of an object of external description.

Alongside political parallels, the British press also employs harsher forms of historical framing. For example, a Daily Star article from 22 December 2025 with the provocative headline ‘Putin’s cannibal soldiers’ [19] relies on unconfirmed claims by Ukrainian intelligence and reinforces the effect of moral revulsion. In this case, the focus shifts from a discussion of political actions to the image of an extremely dangerous and dehumanised enemy. Such rhetoric shifts the conflict from the realm of political analysis to that of an emotionally charged media narrative.

An analysis of recent publications shows that British tabloid newspapers employ several consistent methods for constructing an image of Russia. Among the most notable are historical parallels, evaluative language, personification, the war frame, as well as new forms of visual and technological amplification of the threat. Taken together, these strategies create a predominantly negative image of Russia and reinforce a predetermined interpretation of international events.

Conclusion. In recent decades, the UK media landscape has undergone significant transformation under the influence of digitalisation, changes in media consumption, and increasing media market concentration. A comparison of articles from 2014 and 2022 reveals a shift in tone and growing polarisation in coverage of Russian affairs. In a number of articles in The Telegraph and The Independent, the critical assessment of the Russian political agenda has intensified, and some texts have taken on a harsher tone [20]. At the same time, regional publications, such as the Lurgan Mail, generally paid significantly less attention to Russian issues

1. Sharikov, A. V. The Representation of Russia in British Online Sources in 2022 // Bulletin of the Russian University of Friendship of Peoples. Series: Literary Studies. Journalism. – 2024. – Vol. 29, No. 3. – pp. 534–550.
2. Russia in the spotlight of Anglo-Saxon online media: frequency of mention and tone analysis // International Life. – 2025. – No. 8. – URL: https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/3264 (accessed: 03.04.2026).
3. Yazıcı A. G., Yılmaz M. K. Dimensions of the Ukrainian War in the British Press: A Topic Modelling Approach // Libri. – 2025. – Vol. 75, No. 1. – URL: https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/libri-2024-0130/html (accessed: 26 April 2026).
4. Savelieva N., Nevraeva N., Bozhko E., Alekseeva E., Mukhametshina O. The British Media’s Attitude towards Russia: An Analysis for Teaching Intercultural Interaction // Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Contemporary Globalism. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. – 2020. – Vol. 92. – P. 3786–3791

List of sources
5. Stradner I. Putin’s love of Stalin should terrify us all // The Daily Telegraph. – 29 May 2025. – URL: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/29/putins-love-of stalin-should-terrify-us-all/ (accessed: 16 April 2026).
6. Britain accuses Vladimir Putin of acting like a modern-day Stalin following a sham poll // The Standard. – 17 March 2024. – URL: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/britain-criticise-vladimir-putin-joseph-stalin-sham-election-russia-b1145967.html (accessed: 16 April 2026).
7. The Guardian view on the fourth anniversary of Putin’s war: Ukraine is exhausted, but not broken // The Guardian. – 22 February 2026. – URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/23/the-guardian-view-on-the-fourth-anniversary-of-vladimir-putins-war-ukraine-is-exhausted-but-not-broken- (accessed: 16 April 2026).
8. Hitchens, P. Warmongering Keir Starmer is marching us all to a nuclear exchange... // Daily Mail. – 29 March 2025. – URL: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-14550245/PETER-HITCHENS-Keir-Starmer-lunatic-marching-nuclear-war.html (accessed: 16 April 2026).
9. Russia using AI to target Britons with a flood of fake news // The Times. – 29 April 2025. – URL: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/defence/article/russia-ai-disinformation-pravda-fake-news-plbwwn7v0 (accessed: 16 April 2026).
10. Moscow protests highlight Putin’s draconian approach to democracy // Sky News. – 29 March 2025. – URL: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-14550245/PETER-HITCHENS-Keir-Starmer-lunatic-marching-nuclear-war.html (accessed: 10 April 2026).
11. 999 call handler baffled after Russian AI bots use his voice to win elections // Daily Star. – 31 July 2025. – URL: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/baffled-preston-999-call-handler-35652551 (accessed: 10 April 2026).
12. Putin’s imaginary victories: How a selfie video exposed the Kremlin’s lies // The Mirror. – October 2025. – URL: https://www.mirror.co.uk (accessed: 10 April 2026).
13. Putin has ‘planted more Russian spies in Britain’ after gang caught at beach house // Metro. – 8 March 2025. – URL: https://metro.co.uk/2025/03/08/putin-planted-russian-spies-britain-gang-caught-beach-house-22692892/ (accessed: 10 April 2026).
14. From Novichok to Telegram: Putin’s recipe for ‘mayhem’ in the UK // Metro. – 4 December 2025. – URL: https://metro.co.uk/2025/12/04/novichok-telegram-putins-recipe-mayhem-uk-25109639/ (accessed: 10 April 2026).
15. Rearm now or risk ruin: Britain faces a shrinking three-year window to prepare for war // LBC. – 26 February 2026. – URL: https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/defence-spending-military-5HjdTYK_2/ (accessed: 10 April 2026).
16. Russian spies ‘almost certainly’ tried to derail Moldovan election votes in the UK... // Daily Mail. – 02.03.2025. – URL:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/textbased/news/text-14036383/Russian-spies-tried-derail-Moldovan-election-UK-failed-bomb-threat-plot.html (accessed: 10.04.2026).
17. Hopes dim for Russia-Ukraine peace summit. Trump may do nothing // Daily Express. – 24.08.2025. – URL:https://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news/265236/hopes-dim-for-russia-ukraine-peace-summit-trump-may-do-nothing/ (accessed on 17.04.2026).
18. Zelensky issues stark warning Russia will pull Belarus back into Ukraine war // The Independent. – 18.04.2026. – URL:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-russia-belarus-zelensky-putin-b2960260.html (accessed: 17.04.2026).
19 Putin’s troops ‘turning to cannibalism’ as they plead ‘I just want to eat’ // Daily Star. – 21.12.2025. – URL:https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/putins-troops-turning-cannibalism-plead-36436108 (accessed: 17.04.2026).
20. Russia is now facing the kind of economic disaster that brings governments down // The Independent. – 03.03.2022. – URL:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-14550245/PETER-HITCHENS-Keir-Starmer-lunatic-marching-nuclear-war.html (accessed on 17.04.2026).